Why are these pieces "unpublished?" Good question. If you like, I'll give you the names of the editors who chose not to print these essays and you can ask them yourself.
That's the breaks of the punditry game. I don't mind. And thanks to this website, I can have the last laugh. (Note to editors: If you see something you like here, I'll be happy to take it off the shelf and polish it up for your readers. Two for one special on Thursdays.)
The first piece was written in reaction to a front page story in the New York Times about why two of Al Gore's top consultants weren't talking to each other. Who cares? Well I do, and here's why. The second column is a fantasy about what would happen if we fired all the flacks, closed the press offices and stopped trying to get "good press." Could the results possibly by any worse? The third is a last minute attempt to stop American Express from turning Central Park into a private club. It didn't work.
Your punditry is unpublished because punditry is inherently evil. There is too much of it in the world and, inevitably, it causes heartache and pain wherever
it's seen. Beat your linguistic swords into ploughshares and write gardening columns instead. It would make the world a lovlier place.
Posted by: ignacious | Wednesday, 29 June 2005 at 06:03 PM